Financing innovation: get a free R&D audit!
This diagnosis will enable you to assess the eligibility or vulnerability of your activities to innovation financing schemes.
Test the eligibility or vulnerability of your projects:
- Research tax credit (CIR)
- Innovation tax credit (CII)
- CIR and CII approval
- Young Innovative Company (JEI) status
- Innovation grants and subsidies
These diagnoses are carried out by technical consultants with no obligation and no commercial canvassing.
See you on April 29 and 30, 2015
From 9:00 am to 6:00 pm
at F.Iniciativas, 32 Terrasse Bellini – Esplanade de la Défense – 92800 Puteaux.
REGISTRATION
(mandatory)
If these dates are not convenient for you, or if you are located in another region, individual audits can be scheduled at a later date.
For any questions:
Anne-Dauphine CAMBOURNAC – Tax and Financial Affairs Delegate – Syntec Numériqueadcambournac@syntec-numerique.fr
Bastien CAILLAUT – Marketing and Partnerships Manager – F.IniciativasBastien.CAILLAUT@f-iniciativas.fr
* F.Iniciativas has been selected after consultation as the exclusive partner of Syntec Numérique.
This publication promoted an opportunity for businesses to assess whether their research and development work might qualify for innovation-related financial or tax support. For technology companies, the challenge is often distinguishing genuine scientific or technical uncertainty from routine engineering or product maintenance.
An initial review can help structure project records, staff-time evidence, expenses and the rationale for qualifying work. Any free-audit offer mentioned in the older notice may have expired; a current decision on relief requires checking applicable rules and eligibility for the relevant financial year.
Financial and tax measures must be understood in their correct legal and accounting context. Businesses should confirm which entities are eligible, the years concerned, the required documentation and any limits or exceptions. In international groups, coherence between contracts, actual functions and financial records is particularly important. A historical policy discussion can explain why rules were proposed, but it cannot establish the treatment of a present transaction. Specialist review is appropriate where the amounts or cross-border implications are significant.